modernwizard: (Default)
modernwizard ([personal profile] modernwizard) wrote2008-05-23 08:57 am

That's NOT a Mick Jagger doll!

Medicom Toy is making a Mick Jagger doll. I think it would be a better likeness of Cher instead. Hell, I made a more convincing Mick Jagger by painting some big gorgeous lips on a DML Jennifer. The accompanying Keith Richards doll has a better likeness but, for some reason, both sculpts seem immune to gravity. Even in their youth, the members of the Rolling Stones had fascinatingly mobile and lumpy faces that quickly showed the ravages of their addictions. I see no stretching and wrinkling on these portraits. Very disappointing.

[identity profile] damsel-ophelia.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 01:43 pm (UTC)(link)
"For Heaven's sake don't give him any depth...people won't recognize him!"

[identity profile] freak42.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Good grief when I looked at that Mick Jagger doll at first I thought it must have been the wrong link, I would have sworn that was a woman.

[identity profile] eyefeather.livejournal.com 2008-05-24 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
How disappointing, indeed. Not even close, I'd say.