I didn't say it. Stephen Marche says it in Esquire. He thinks that the recent spate of popular vampires represents not, oh, say, dangerous sensuality or suave seductiveness or something, but the desire of straight women to get into bed with gay men. He provides no actual evidence for his claim, other than noting that True Blood's anti-vamp crowd ["God hates fangs!"] sounds a lot like the anti-gay crowd. In fact, not till the end of his blithering ramble does Marche reveal what may be his thesis:
And so vampires have appeared to help America process its newfound acceptance of what so many once thought strange or abnormal. Adam and Steve who live on your corner with their adorable little son and run a bakery? The transgendered man who gave birth to a healthy baby? The teenage girl who wishes that all boys could be vampires? All part of the luscious and terrifying magic of today's sexual revolution.
no subject
Date: Oct. 22nd, 2009 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Oct. 22nd, 2009 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Oct. 22nd, 2009 09:47 pm (UTC)There are far too many close-minded sickos out there who use everything to further their own twisted agenda. *sigh*
no subject
Date: Oct. 22nd, 2009 10:50 pm (UTC)... O.o REALLY??? Silly straight people who think they know things!
no subject
Date: Oct. 23rd, 2009 03:04 pm (UTC)Did he take a poll to reach his conclusion that young women want to have sex with gay men? As a young woman in the 70s, I enjoyed "Dark Shadows" and liked Barnabas Collins, the lead vampire. But I didn't want to have sex with Barnabas. BtW, how many young women even like the "Twilight" series?
Interesting to read if decidedly odd. Thanks for sharing.
no subject
Date: Oct. 24th, 2009 12:42 pm (UTC)It's like Twitchell and his theory where a vampire film viewer projects themselves in an incestuous relationship on to the vampire attacking their victim. It sounds interesting at first but ultimately it's got more holes than Swiss cheese.